January 24, 2008...5:41 pm

im in ur walmartz, spendin yur tax dollarz.

Jump to Comments

So the government is planning to carpet-bomb the electorate with tax refund checks, in the hopes that Mr. and Mrs. Sixpack are going to go out to MalWart and blow their windfall on a flat-panel TV or something. According to the article at CNN, it’ll be in the order of $600 per taxpayer and $1200 per couple, with an additional $300 for every child. For us, that would mean a $1800 check, but it would be a refund of our own damn money, so pardon me for not jumping up and down and thanking the folks in charge for their generosity. That’d be much like expressing gratitude to a mugger who takes your wallet and then gives you a $20 bill back so you can get a cab ride home.

Now, any time the government plans on returning some of our cash to us, I’m all for it. Part of me–the cynical, elitist part that some of you love so much–is kind of skeptical about the odds of reviving our $17 trillion economy by injecting a measly couple of billion into the market by way of rednecks buying Chinese-made shit at Wally World.  Oh, and they’re going to give the refund to everyone, including folks who didn’t pay any income taxes last year.  (Wouldn’t want Welfare Acres to rise up in riot for being left out when there are checks hitting the mailboxes in Suburbia for a change, would we?)

But, hey–whatever. If they go through with it, and we see $1800 in our mailbox by June, we’ll do exactly what they don’t want us to do, and stuff that check into the savings account to have in reserve, so we can weather the coming financial shitstorm.

Now, I’m not one of those people who blame all the evils of the world on the Chimperor, but maybe that stimulus package wouldn’t be necessary if we hadn’t turned a budget surplus into a huge deficit by chucking a half trillion dollars a year down that hole in the sand between Tigris and Euphrates for the last six years or so. The Conservatives have long since abandoned any fiscal restraint, and Dubya has racked up the national charge card to staggering amounts. I’m starting to think that the only thing worse than a tax-and-spend liberal is a borrow-and-spend conservative.

Alas, the government has been spending beyond our means for a long time now, and both parties are equally guilty. We’ve had decades of successive administrations and Congresses keep building up that fiscal house of cards while hoping (or knowing) that it’s not going to collapse before their retirement or death. In an age where two thirds of the federal budget goes to entitlement payouts, the way to curb spending is to cut those entitlements, and everyone drawing a paycheck on the Hill knows that it would be political death to even propose doing so. You try and cut the checks from Uncle Sugar, and come election time you have millions of screaming proles running to the polls to vote your ass out of office.

(The most powerful lobby in D.C. is the AARP, by the way, whose members largely refuse to do simple math and acknowledge the very obvious mathematical problem with Social Security and Medicare. They’ll wave their crutches and shout something about how it’s their money, and how they deserve to get back what they paid in…but who don’t give a rat’s ass about the GenX folks who will also pay in all their lives, only to be left holding the bag when they retire and the system has suffered fiscal collapse. I got mine, and I’ll be long dead when you can’t get yours, Sonny.)

The people who get to pay back the bill for all those “free” government checks are the ones like the two kids that are taking naps in their bedrooms as I type this, and they’re blissfully unaware of the fact that their government is borrowing money and promising to pay it back out of their future paychecks.

And that kind of pisses me off, to put it mildly.

15 Comments

  • So the government is planning to carpet-bomb the electorate with tax refund checks, in the hopes that Mrs. and Mrs. Sixpack…

    First we let the gays get married and now they’re stealing our tax dollars.

    Shit.

  • munchkinwrangler

    Im in ur Walmartz, spendin your tax dollarz.

    Hell, that makes a much better title for this post.

    And yeah, it’s the fault of the queers. Pat Robertson was right. God is tanking the stock markets because we’re not stoning teh gayzorz.

  • Amen…

  • I used that same analogy this morning…..only it’s more like a mugger taking 100 bucks and giving you a dollar back percentage wise.

  • Instead of spending time figuring out a quick feel good scheme, the almighty guv’ment should have been considering a better tax system. Keep my $$$ this year and start the Fair Tax next year.

  • This is why I claim extra exemptions on my taxes. I get a bill at the end of the year for taxes owed, but I’ve saved for it, and at least my money was working for me all year long instead of being an interest free loan to the federal government.

  • Oh well … I can always spend MY money on more firearms and beer.

  • [...] The Munchkin Wrangler- So the government is planning to carpet-bomb the electorate with tax refund checks, in the hopes that Mr. and Mrs. Sixpack are going to go out to MalWart and blow their windfall on a flat-panel TV or something. [...]

  • I figure I’ll spend it on guns and/or ammo, something tangible, anyway. When TSHTF, fiat currency will be worthless, anyway.

  • Hmm. Bullets.

  • Markos:

    Not only is the dot-gove giving our tax dollars to critters who’ve never paid income taxes in their lives, there’s also an UPPER limit on income that determines whether or not they’ll get a check. I don’t know the exact numbers, but couples earning more than some arbitrary and capricious figure get reduced “rebates”, or (if they’re actually reasonably well-paid professionals) bupkiss.

    I’m too lazy to search for the data, but I seem to recall that the top 1% of income earners pay something on the order of 1/3 of all income tax. So the people who have paid the most in, get the least out. And the parasites who’ve done nothing to contribute to a productive economy (other than having one subsidized child after another) get the benefit.

    A clearer example of redistribution of wealth would be hard to find (outside of maybe Venezuela or Zimbabwe).

  • It’s all bogus. If they truely wanted to stimulate the economy, forgo any new taxes/fees and lower the freakin’ tax rate…permenantly. That would, of course take longer than cutting a check. And too many out there will jump up and down in gratitude when they receive that .gov check.

  • If they give me back some of what they have taken, it will be cash in the safe, right where I can lay my hands on it.

    Fluid hell….. I might even invest it in ammo.

  • I actually irritated a gal at work the other day when I called her ‘rebate’ check welfare after she mentioned that she gets every penny she pays back (single with 2 kids) every year.

  • But, hey–whatever. If they go through with it, and we see $1800 in our mailbox by June, we’ll do exactly what they don’t want us to do, and stuff that check into the savings account to have in reserve, so we can weather the coming financial shitstorm.

    I’d recommend turning it into something more tangible than promises from the government, which is all those worthless f’n fiat dollars are anyway.


Leave a Reply