somebody’s baby.

The more I read about the Eve Carson murder, the more disgusted and depressed I get.

We hear about murders like this just about every day, but unless we’re directly involved in the lives of the victims, we don’t really pause and think about the magnitude of such a crime.

That girl was somebody’s baby.

Somebody looked at her sonogram pictures and looked forward to holding her for the first time.

Somebody welcomed her into the world, swaddled her, nursed her, and stayed awake at night for weeks and months tending to her, and worrying about her.

Somebody changed a few thousand diapers for her, read her a few thousand goodnight stories, gave her a few thousand hugs and kisses, and got a few thousand in return from her.

Somebody taught her to walk, to speak, to read, to ride a bike. Somebody listened to her first word, somebody made a big affair out of it when she used the potty for the first time, and somebody made sure she was dressed and fed and loved at all times.

Somebody listened to her hopes and dreams. Somebody made up stories and played tea party with her.

Somebody was proud of her when she brought home good grades. Somebody consoled her when she had her heart broken for the first time.

Somebody kissed her for the first time, and somebody sent her her first Valentine’s Day card.

Somebody was excited with her when she worked hard enough to get a scholarship for college, and somebody was happy for her when she was accepted into the school of her choice.

Somebody sent her off into the world with pride, love, and trepidation.

Then, one night last week, she pulled up at an intersection in the middle of the night, and somebody else decided that they wanted what she had.

Somebody else took her lives from her–both the life she had, and the life she was going to have, everything that she was, and everything that she could have been. Somebody snuffed her out without thought, erased her history, her desires, her hopes, her dreams–because they wanted the car she drove, and the money she carried with her.

They also took the lives of her family, in a way. That family will never be the same again–every time Eve’s birthday comes around, every Christmas, every family gathering where stories and presents are exchanged and new children and grandchildren welcomed, the wound will be opened once more, and it will never truly heal. Taking one’s child, sibling, and grandchild away is like ripping a piece out of someone’s heart and discarding it forever, and none who have buried a daughter or a sister or a grandchild can ever be made entirely whole again. They killed Eve, but they also killed a piece of every member of her family, and caused grief that will endure for decades.

How do you punish such an act? How can there be any sort of satisfactory retribution for it? How can there be rehabilitation for the person who thinks they have the right to toss a life away like an old candy wrapper?

Maybe some crimes can’t be punished appropriately. Maybe there are some deeds so reprehensible that it’s no longer about punishment, revenge, or redemption. Maybe some actions are so far beyond such concepts that the only thing left to do is to remove the offender from existence as swiftly and unceremoniously as possible, like putting down a dangerous animal, so they’ll at least never have the opportunity to take another life.

I don’t know what goes on in the mind of someone who decides that a few hundred dollars and a car are a good enough reason to put a gun to the head of someone else and pull the trigger. I don’t know what we can do to keep such things from happening. I don’t know if there’s anything we can do to that end–humans have preyed on each other for as long as we have existed as a species.

I do know one thing: a sidearm in a holster, or pocket, or purse more than any other thing gives credibility to the statement, “I am not food, and if you try to harm me or mine, you will receive harm in return.”

And I also know that in a civilized society, the life of Eve Carson’s murderer wouldn’t be worth a bucket of warm piss anymore.

 

ADDENDUM:

I don’t want to give the impression that I want to deny due process to murderers.  They have the right to a trial, of course, and I agree with the folks who commented and said that we need to remove folks like Eve’s killers from society with much the same dispassionate attitude that a surgeon has when he removes a tumor from a patient.

What I would prefer to see, I guess, is a society where murders are a rare event because the intended victims would have the means and the attitude necessary to return the aggression in kind, and put a bullet into their would-be killer.  I’d like to see a society where we don’t teach people the lie that “you don’t need to have the knowledge or tools for self-defense, because the police will protect you”, and where our children don’t buy into those lies. 

I’d like to see a society where due process is granted to those accused of a crime, but where the only due process given to those who are caught in the commission of robbery, rape, assault, or murder is a bullet to center mass, administered by their intended victim or a witness to the crime.

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

16 Comments on “somebody’s baby.”

  1. Mauser*Girl Says:

    Let me state first off that I am not a racist person.

    However, when I see cases like this, I find it difficult not to make it about race. I find it difficult because the murder of a white girl who is on the right track in her life receives less media attention in this day and age than the supposed crime that was committed when a group of white kids placed a noose in a tree at their high school.

    If Eve Carson had been African American and her murderer had been white, the black community would be outraged. There would be marches on Washington. Jesse Jackson would give a radio address. They would seek to convict the perpetrator not only of the murder, but also of a race crime. They would make it all about race.

    Why is the murder of a white girl by a black man different? Where are the outraged masses and the reverends’ speeches?

  2. Fjolnirsson Says:

    When I hear of things like this, I get a thirst for a little old world justice…whomever is responsible for the death of Eve Carson is a monster. He should be treated monstrously. The old Icelandic tradition of the “blood raven”, perhaps, or being drug by a horse until dead.
    Then I remember that we cannot become the monsters we hate. Upon conviction, this man should be marched behind the courthouse and shot. As you said, he wouldn’t do it again…

  3. marniemom Says:

    Thank you for your essay. As someone who knew Eve only slightly- I have been grieving more than perhaps I have a right to. Now I know why…we all have spent hours of joy and invested the best of ourselves in children who we believe will help to change the world. When one is taken away…it’s terrifying.

  4. Jim Sullivan Says:

    “Maybe some actions are so far beyond such concepts that the only thing left to do is to remove the offender from existence as swiftly and unceremoniously as possible, like putting down a dangerous animal, so they’ll at least never have the opportunity to take another life.”

    That’s damn right. Don’t punish or torture or extract revenge. Just remove them like a harmful infection.

  5. markhb Says:

    I’m with Jim on this one. Dispassion is paramount. Reading about this, my blood heats and I experience a powerful urge to get very Old Testament. That’s incredibly dangerous, the urge to go riding in and laying waste.

    But the correct approach, to my mind rather than my heart, is to dispassionately excise the malignant tumor. Without hate, without rage, without fury or retribution, but with clinical detatchment.

    It’s difficult to hold onto that, when the subject matter’s provoking white, incandescent rage but I guess that’s one of the tests.

  6. Tam Says:

    I think I could very dispassionately deliver several doses of 26oz. of Estwingazine cranially and then have a nice dinner and a good night’s sleep, knowing I’ve made the world a better place.

  7. markhb Says:

    Quite right, too.

  8. Anthony L. Says:

    “I don’t know what goes on in the mind of someone who decides that a few hundred dollars and a car are a good enough reason to put a gun to the head of someone else and pull the trigger.”

    And I personally don’t care, as long as they cease to exist, post haste. Your above statement is the very essence of why we need a death penalty. Add to that child molesters and rapists. They ALL take away so much from their victims and their families that rehabilitation no longer matters. The victims will never be healed; why should society afford that comfort to the scum who committed the crime?

    With a conviction, do exactly as markhb commented above; take out the trash, dispassionately and with dispatch.

  9. SemperGumby Says:

    Couldn’t agree more. Thank you for your common sense and reason on this and many other topics. I hope you don’t mind if I quote you. Keep it up.

  10. perlhaqr Says:

    Man.

    I read something like this, and I think the appropriate response is to take the … human shaped entities responsible, and drop them feet first through a wood chipper.

    But then I think to all the stories Radley Balko has been running lately about a number of life-in-prison convicts being found innocent due to medical examiner malfeasance, and I remember that the government can’t even pave roads. I’d want to make damn sure I was killing the right guy.

    Eve’s murder calls out for blood, but we have to make damn sure it’s the right blood that gets spilled.

  11. the pawnbroker Says:

    right on that, perlhaqr, but once i’m damn sure, if this is my child? there is no place on earth where this scum could hide, no protective custody that could protect him, from me and my visceral vengeance…jtc

  12. Eric Hammer Says:

    The issues of the justice system in convicting the innocent is precisely why every person should be able to defend themselves in such a situation. Whether the crime be rape or murder, there is little question of “getting the right man” when said man is laying in a pool of his own blood.

    “Oh, it’s that guy. Case closed. Let’s get a beer.”

  13. Tam Says:

    The meet and proper time and place for capital punishment is at the feet of the intended victim…

    …and it’s only my vindictive streak that wants to add “futilely begging for mercy he wouldn’t himself have granted.

  14. perlhaqr Says:

    I absolutely agree. I’m not sure that a handgun in the hands of this victim, or the one from Duke, would have turned the tide in this particular case, but as they say, a rising tide lifts all boats. And it certainly couldn’t have made things worse.

    If they’ve got the right guy, (meaning, he’s guilty) he should die at the end of his trial. But I don’t generally trust the government to properly engineer a peanut-butter and jelly sandwich, which is why the Death Penalty, as administered by the government, makes me nervous.

    (Sorry if I’m not making my point clearly, I threw my back out hard this morning, and I’m typing through a fog of painkillers.)

  15. perlhaqr Says:

    Err, what I meant by the “rising tide” comment was, a higher incidence of concealed carry will tend to have a damping effect on general criminality.

  16. DAL357 Says:

    http://www.vdare.com/taylor/050913_crime.htm

    MauserGirl, please follow the above link for more sad info. on race and crime.

Comment: