camera hounds for hamas.

Can someone please tell Cynthia McKinney to shut her frickin’ piehole?

One doesn’t try to take a 60-foot pleasure boat to Gaza to help the poor, oppressed Palestinians, whose beloved Hamas are only getting the shit bombed out of them because they won’t stop shooting rockets into Israel.  A 60-foot pleasure boat can’t hold enough doctors and medical supplies to make a dent in the health care needs of a population of 1.5 million people.

One tries to take a 60-foot pleasure craft to Gaza to either provoke a response by the Israeli Navy, or troll for photo ops at the Gaza seashore by handing off a few boxes of Band-Aids to the poor, oppressed Palestinians.  One does such a thing so one can go back to one’s constituents (present, past, or future) and claim that one is the cat’s meow when it comes to international conflicts and humanitarian relief.  (A chance for running one’s stupid mouth and blaming everything on the Evil Jooz is a bonus, of course.)

Note that if the Evil Jooz were really out for blood, Gaza casualties would be way higher than the 300-ish dead reported so far (which are mostly uniformed Hamas members, even according to Hamas.) Also, they would have blown Cynthia’s little nutshell out of the water with cannon fire, instead of giving them a bump.

Whenever you’re confused about the identity of the Good Guys and the Bad Guys in a conflict, here’s a tip for clarification. When one side mostly targets only armed belligerents, and the other side straps bombs to their kids and sends them into crowded pizza parlors, there should be little confusion as to which side wears the black hats.  (Let’s talk about avoiding collateral damage when Hamas stops launching rockets and mortars from the rooftops of civilian buildings to provoke civilian casualties so they can blame the Evil Jooz.)

God, that article makes the bile rise in my throat.  Human rights activists from the “Free Gaza Solidarity Movement”? Yeah, that crowd is totally objective.  How about including human rights activists from the “Stop Launching Fucking Missiles Into Israel Movement”?

16 thoughts on “camera hounds for hamas.

  1. “Whenever you’re confused about the identity of the Good Guys and the Bad Guys in a conflict, here’s a tip for clarification. When one side mostly targets only armed belligerents, and the other side straps bombs to their kids and sends them into crowded pizza parlors, there should be little confusion as to which side wears the black hats.”

    good to finally see some recognition that our war on terrorists and terrorism is justified and just…oh, wait…i was confused for a minute there.

    jtc

  2. Human rights activists from the Stop Launching Fucking Missiles Into Israel Movement are on the scene already.

  3. back on topic, though…somebody give the nutjob in the nutshell a black hat to go with her black heart and get that cannon fire going!

    byebye, cindy…

  4. CharlesGibsonSucks says:

    So what are they suppose to thing when a ship attempts to run a blockade? They are luck they didn’t send Mr. Harpoon or Mr.Gabriel to visit.

  5. Alchemist says:

    I can’t tell you how my blood boils when I read about the whole Gaza conflict.
    Wall to wall idiots, I tell you. I mean, they’ve tried bombing the crap out of each other, maiming each other’s children, all to no avail, and yet they continue. Insanity.
    Then some twit in pleasure craft goes out to sea and turns what is a human tragedy into a self-aggrandising, photo-op wankfest, and I just feel sick.
    What is wrong with that woman? Was she dropped on her head as a baby? Perhaps she needs to be dropped on her head now?

  6. MarkHB says:

    Guhhh. Just showing that there’s no upper ceiling to the Stupid Density you can pack into any given volume.

    Am I the only one to see a parallel between bastards seeking martyrdom by playing Knock Knock Ginger with SRBMs into Israel, and bastards who gun down assloads of fellow students/their family and ex-wife/random strangers before committing Suicide By Cop?

    The fact that this McKinney person went chugging into harbour with a pleasure boat whose onboard mass of medical supplies was doubtless at least 2% of the mass of canapés and Sauvignon Blanc will, of course, be lost on the Vast Majority of People.

    Her lovingly prepared soundbyte of “Our mission was a peaceful mission” glosses cheerfully over her lack of sense or right in unilaterally giving herself that mission. And again, the VMP will yum it right up. Missions of Peace are Good, after all.

    As long as the Israelis can stick with the Legal Thing rather than giving into the temptation of dunking a bagel in gasoline and throwing it at her* then this should just fade from the headlines relatively quickly.

    *The Mazel-Tov Cocktail, a lesser-known IID

  7. Jen says:

    We are very pleased in Atlanta that she is embarrassing the entire country, instead of reflecting solely on as she did for many, many years. Now if we could just get them to unname the highway they named after her when she was in office here…

    She is a geiser of crayzee.

  8. perlhaqr says:

    I wonder if anyone over there has a real game plan.

    As it is now, with the blockade, Gaza can’t improve it’s position, a’la Hong Kong, even if it wanted to. (And yes, I understand that for logistical reasons, the Israelis have to blockade Gaza, to keep half a dozen whoevers from shipping even more artillery to the Gazans.)

    I suppose it would require a sufficient number of people who live in Gaza to realize which side is most responsible for the miserable conditions under which they live, and work with the Israelis to really track down the criminal elements there, and throw them out.

    Bootstrapping that process is going to be pretty hard, though. (I’m still competing for the Understatement of the Year award. I’ve got 16 hours left!)

  9. Ahab says:

    You know what really kills me about that article? The part where the activists say that the Israelis rammed their boat intentionally. That’s utter bullcrap.

    No competent naval officer is going to whack another boat with his, unless the size differential is “destroyer vs. sailboat”. It really, really wouldn’t surprise me if the skip of the “humanitarian” boat was playing a little bit of high stakes chicken with the Israelis, and the Israeli guy didn’t blink and boats got bumped.

  10. JD says:

    They should have sunk her. Would have saved us all a lot of grief. . . .

  11. Heath J says:

    Exocet.

    For all of your crazy bitch and hippy eradication problems..

  12. MarkHB says:

    Children, children! Killing is easy. humiliation is harder, but so much more worthwhile. The whineys are saying how an Israeli pilot could never “just grase” a civboat.

    Bollocks. I’d trust an Isreali pilot to take one letter off my pennant, let alone “accidentally ramming” me. They did good. They showed up a shill as a shill.

  13. Robert says:

    Ahab – from what I heard, the Israeli ship involved was a 550 ton missile frigate. The boat McKrazy was on was a 60 foot yacht.

    If the Israeli vessel had intentionally rammed that yacht, it’d be in two pieces on the bottom of the Mediterranean.

    Israeli sources claim the yacht hit the missile frigate, not the other way around, which wouldn’t be that surprising given the fact that there is no way in hell a pleasure craft could fail to outmaneuver a war vessel of that size.

  14. red says:

    I think someone needs to make an “Evil Jooz” patch.

  15. MarkHB says:

    Ahh, the horned red Yarmukle, symbol of the huge amount of opression caused by… er… one of the most historically oppressed and fucked-over groups of people on the planet.

  16. […] QUote of the Day – Black Hat Edition Whenever you’re confused about the identity of the Good Guys and the Bad Guys in a conflict, here’s a tip for clarification. When one side mostly targets only armed belligerents, and the other side straps bombs to their kids and sends them into crowded pizza parlors, there should be little confusion as to which side wears the black hats. – Marko […]

Comments are closed.